Comments on: Now Gambhir is on the “hate-list” http://i3j3cricket.com/2008/10/30/now-gambhir-is-on-the-hate-list/ India-India-India Jai-Jai-Jai (i3j3) Wed, 30 May 2012 10:02:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Adjective watch: “Recalcitrant Gambhir” | smartdesis.com http://i3j3cricket.com/2008/10/30/now-gambhir-is-on-the-hate-list/#comment-10543 Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:17:38 +0000 http://i3j3cricket.wordpress.com/?p=1398#comment-10543 [...] visitors to i3j3Cricket may know that we commenced i3j3’s “Adjective Watch” Department. This was our own response to the Australian Labour Government’s Fuel Watch, Carbon Watch, [...]

]]> By: Adjective watch: “Recalcitrant Gambhir” « i3j3Cricket :: A blog for fans of Indian cricket… http://i3j3cricket.com/2008/10/30/now-gambhir-is-on-the-hate-list/#comment-10533 Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:24:46 +0000 http://i3j3cricket.wordpress.com/?p=1398#comment-10533 [...] visitors may know that we commenced i3j3’s “Adjective Watch” Department. This was our own response to the Australian Labour Government’s Fuel Watch, Carbon Watch, [...]

]]> By: Andrew Kumar http://i3j3cricket.com/2008/10/30/now-gambhir-is-on-the-hate-list/#comment-10510 Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:19:04 +0000 http://i3j3cricket.wordpress.com/?p=1398#comment-10510 I like the tone of that reply mohan… it took me a while but it’s making me laugh now!!

]]> By: Watson charged, Gambhir will be! | smartdesis.com http://i3j3cricket.com/2008/10/30/now-gambhir-is-on-the-hate-list/#comment-10500 Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:17:27 +0000 http://i3j3cricket.wordpress.com/?p=1398#comment-10500 [...] we wrote here about how Gautam Gambhir was not the new-hate in Australian media [...]

]]> By: Watson charged, Gambhir will be! « i3j3Cricket :: A blog for fans of Indian cricket… http://i3j3cricket.com/2008/10/30/now-gambhir-is-on-the-hate-list/#comment-10489 Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:55:39 +0000 http://i3j3cricket.wordpress.com/?p=1398#comment-10489 [...] we wrote here about how Gautam Gambhir was not the new-hate in Australian media [...]

]]> By: mohankaus http://i3j3cricket.com/2008/10/30/now-gambhir-is-on-the-hate-list/#comment-10488 Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:44:37 +0000 http://i3j3cricket.wordpress.com/?p=1398#comment-10488 @Andrew Kumar

Hmmm! Let’s define “dignity” here shall we? Like how the Australians won in Sydney perhaps? With all the carry-on and the jumping-around like pork chops? Hard-nosed Aussie friends of mine were disgusted by that.

So why don’t we celebrate like the Australians did in Sydney then shall we?

And talking of “dignity” weren’t you the pillock that talked about retiring off the Fab Four geriatrics and getting their loved ones to cart them around the field on wheelchairs?

And you have the gall to talk about dignity?

If you weren’t cut from cloth that I know very well, I’d call you an absolute shame and a disgrace Andrew Kumar! I shall refrain now… I’d appreciate a contrite comment back from you. But I won’t be surprised if none is forthcoming!

– Mohan

]]> By: Andrew Kumar http://i3j3cricket.com/2008/10/30/now-gambhir-is-on-the-hate-list/#comment-10487 Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:08:32 +0000 http://i3j3cricket.wordpress.com/?p=1398#comment-10487 @ Shaaaks

And from the tone of the posts on this blog Indians don’t seem to know how to win with dignity…

]]> By: shaaakspsyco http://i3j3cricket.com/2008/10/30/now-gambhir-is-on-the-hate-list/#comment-10484 Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:25:34 +0000 http://i3j3cricket.wordpress.com/?p=1398#comment-10484 the Aussies have always been frail, sore losers. Its just that it has never shown through the past decade because they just kept winning.

]]> By: JB http://i3j3cricket.com/2008/10/30/now-gambhir-is-on-the-hate-list/#comment-10471 Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:05:10 +0000 http://i3j3cricket.wordpress.com/?p=1398#comment-10471 Nik,

Consider us “moved on”.

Cheers,

JB

]]> By: nik http://i3j3cricket.com/2008/10/30/now-gambhir-is-on-the-hate-list/#comment-10469 Thu, 30 Oct 2008 06:27:36 +0000 http://i3j3cricket.wordpress.com/?p=1398#comment-10469 JB,

I used Lillee-Miandad incident to counter your claim that “We have NEVER dished that out” and hence it is relevant to the argument.

If by never you meant the last decade, then you should have worded your claim differently.

I am no issues in moving on.

]]>